The box occupied by plaintiff on Februcontained five seats. ![]() In 1992, defendant Irwin manufactured over 400 Marquee chairs which were installed in the box seat section of the Track. The evidence presented at the trial includes the following. The jury found no defect under the Product Liability Act nor a "dangerous condition" for purposes of the Tort Claims Act ("TCA"). Plaintiffs assert there were "both design and manufacturing defects in the weld area" and that NJSEA failed "to properly maintain the chair and respond to complaints from other patrons" that the chair was defective or broken. ("defendant Irwin") and "of prior incidents of chair failures in the box seat section of the grandstand level" the verdict on product defect in favor of defendant Irwin was against the weight of the evidence, the jury charges on product defect and negligence were erroneous, and the verdict in favor of the NJSEA on the "dangerous condition" issue was against the weight of the evidence and should have been found by the judge as a matter of law. On this appeal, they contend a new trial should be granted because the judge precluded "evidence of remedial repairs to the Marquee chair by defendant Irwin" Seating Co. ![]() Plaintiff-husband (hereinafter "plaintiff") claims to have sustained injuries as a result of a seat collapse at the Meadowlands Race Track ("Track"), and his wife sued per quod. Plaintiffs also appeal from the denial on Apof their motion for new trial as to defendant New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority ("NJSEA"). Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered on Main favor of both defendants based on a unanimous jury verdict of no cause for action. New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority Irwin Seating Company (Carroll, McNulty & Kull,Īttorneys Mr. ![]() Before Judges Stern, Collester and Baxter.Ĭolleen MacKuse argued the cause for appellants
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |